ProcFG vs InfiniVision: Image Acquisition Architecture Comparison

Gidel provides two advanced FPGA-based image acquisition architectures. In this ProcFG vs InfiniVision comparison, we observe that although both operate on the same Gidel hardware, they target distinct acquisition models. Specifically, ProcFG optimizes deterministic, per-camera capture, while InfiniVision targets scalable, synchronized multi-camera acquisition.

ProcFG vs InfiniVision – Comparison Table

Key Features

Model	ProcFG	InfiniVision
System Architecture
Availability	Available on all Gidel frame grabber systems	Available on all Gidel frame grabber systems
Camera Interfaces	GigE Vision CoaXPress Camera Link	GigE Vision CoaXPress Camera Link
Acquisition Scale	Up to ~120 FPS per stream	100+ synchronized cameras >100,000 FPS aggregate throughput
Synchronization Model	Independent, per-camera deterministic acquisition	Global, hardware-level synchronization across all cameras
Grabbing & Recording Modes	Uncompressed image streams	Uncompressed image streams Compressed image streams
Frame Size Handling	Static frame sizes	Dynamic frame sizes and varying incoming formats
ROI Handling	Selected ROI grabbing	Dynamic ROI handling per camera and per frame
Inline FPGA Processing	Optional inline full customized Image Signal Processing (ISP) via ProcVision	Optional inline full customized Image Signal Processing (ISP) via ProcVision Optional inline image compression
Optimization Focus	Line-scan and continuous acquisition applications	Large-scale, high-density multi-camera systems
Software & Extensibility	Dedicated API per camera Built-in image debugging tools Integrated with Gidel Grabber SDK	Integrated with Gidel Grabber SDK High-bandwidth PCIe-based host interface

Conclusion: ProcFG vs InfiniVision for FPGA Image Acquisition

Although ProcFG and InfiniVision utilize the same FPGA-based frame grabber hardware, they target fundamentally different system architectures and scaling requirements. Specifically, ProcFG serves as the natural choice for applications demanding deterministic, per-camera acquisition with guaranteed frame integrity. For instance, it excels in line-scan systems, continuous recording, and inspection pipelines where predictability, simplicity, and long-duration stability outweigh system scale.

In contrast, InfiniVision targets the opposite end of the spectrum: large-scale vision systems requiring synchronized acquisition across dozens or hundreds of cameras. Furthermore, it enables extreme aggregate throughput, flexible frame handling, and centralized synchronization. Consequently, this architecture proves ideal for multi-camera arrays, volumetric imaging, and high-density inspection systems.

Ultimately, by offering both architectures within the same hardware and software ecosystem, Gidel empowers system designers to select the exact acquisition model that matches their application according to global Vision Standards. Thus, users achieve their goals without compromising performance, determinism, or future scalability.

Need more information?